Respected
Father,
“The
darkest places in Hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in
times of moral crisis” – Dante Alighieri
If
Dante is to be believed then we Indians have been living in the shadows of a
fake “Father”. You were the Mahatma; the “great soul”; then how did you remain
notoriously silent during the most devastating instance of moral crisis in
Indian history- the partition of 1947?
You
were the one who lambasted “moral weakness” as the worst ailment of mankind
throughout your life, then why did your morality not cry out in anguish like
thousands of other Indians then?
Whether,
despite commanding immense respect from a population of million or more, you
couldn’t or didn’t persuade Jinnah and Mountbatten to cancel the orders that
prescribed the partition of India as a cure for her religious maladies, shall
forever remain the most painful unanswered question that single handedly shaped
the future of two nations. As two newly born nations tried to helplessly adjust
to the rawness of religious turmoil , the blood of both Hindus and Muslims
scalding the divided earth and the earth itself reeking of hatred , you chose
this improper moment in history to respect silence as golden. As an Indian who
was born exactly 47 years after this event, who still feels the cataclysmic
reverberations of your silence in the pathetic existence of one brother amidst
daily terrorist attacks, growing old amidst suicide bombers and drone attacks;
of the other brother amidst religious atrocities and political scams, as an
Indian denied the opportunity to see Wasim Akram and Sachin Tendulkar sing the
same national anthem before ripping apart the cricketing world , as an Indian
who thinks Jinnah would have been a better and more far-sighted Prime Minister
, I ask you why ?
Perhaps
you didn’t want the blood of a few rioters to stain your “great soul” and your
khadi dhoti. Perhaps you feared speaking out would reduce your support base.
Perhaps Nehru had been pulling the strings. Whatever the reasons your lack of
ability or lack of desire in keeping India united showed and the signs were
picked up by disappointed Hindus and Muslims alike , who in the absence of an
able leader followed Darwin’s Laws of Survival to the t. This was definitely
the moment when India needed the demigod that you were to stand up more than
ever before and run a healing hand through the subcontinent which had been so
brutally ripped into two. But you chose instead to fast. As a young boy
confounded and pained alike by the decision more than 50 years later, I ask
why?
You,
my father, told all of us, your children, to not practice violence, not to
fight fire with fire but instead to fast and actively protest against the cause
of the fire while we allow the fire to rage on, allow it to burn us. Admirable
teachings, indeed father which made the world gasp and take note and continue
to charm many even today. As a confused son, I therefore ask of you this- when a
rapist disrespects the dignity of my sister or any of my girl-friends, then
should I push another into his path representing the other cheek, should I at
that moment choose to calmly explain to him the depravity of his sinful act or
should I proclaim that I will not consume any food because of what has happened?
You
, father talked of principles and righteousness yet when a younger and more
able leader won the Congress Presidential Election in 1939 you proclaimed it
“more my loss than Bose’s victory” . Did such comments reflect the principles
you treasured, the saintly image you projected or did it betray the very same
and reek of jealously? Was refusing to work with the man who had the same dream
as you once did, the best way forward for the nation desperately seeking
direction? Was that the legacy you wanted to leave behind for young leaders
wishing to emulate their “Father”?
You
dreamt of an India, father that few dared to dream at that time. A dream that
was later shared by many- a dream of an independent India that had her
foundations in peace and Satyagraha. Indeed it was a brave dream, utopic some
may call it but a dream nonetheless. But father, did you yourself lose sight of
the ultimate aim when you suspended the Civil Disobedience Movement in light of
the Chauri Chaura incident ? Did the dream of a “Gandhian India” supersede the
dream of an “independent India”? Did you start relishing your dream while it
was yet to be achieved, perhaps a little too ambitiously? Is this the legacy
you wanted to leave behind – to destroy everything for one’s selfish needs? Is
this what you wanted the future to inherit from you?
Your
teachings of non-violence greatly influences me, father. It is only pride that
fills my heart when the international press lauds your impact on the American
Civil war and other world movements. When stories of your resilient march to
Dandi to make salt in a non-violent betrayal of British laws are told in
history classes even today, they make me feel proud. Yet father, as a confused
child, I fail to understand how , you who sympathized with the downtrodden in
society –the Harijans , you asked the Jews to submit themselves to the power of
Hitler , to allow themselves to be slaughtered like sacrificial lambs at his
foot to cleanse the human race ? How could you be so hypocritical and support
this purgatory act of Hitler’s?
My
father, the reports of your alleged homosexual relationship with German
bodybuilder Kallenbach doesn’t bother me .Neither do the stories of your sexual
experiments with your nieces because I live in a world far more receptive of a
human being’s sexuality than you did. It may be all rumours and news bites, all
lies and tales but one can’t help but trust them considering the sources are
the victims themselves. What, however does bother me is why you chose to hide
all of this in your autobiography? Why do I have to hear all of this from
someone else? Did you not trust your children enough to reveal the truth,
“Truth” being the cornerstone of your life? You could have been the idol for
thousands of people who faced humiliation in their workplaces in the coming
years due to their sexualities. You could have been a beacon of light in the
dark world of repressed sexualities. Yet, again, you chose silence father. You
could have stood up for the truth but you didn’t. Why, father, why?
You
are the closest thing to God that your “children” ever knew and yet you hid so
much from them, betraying them in times of need. Was the need to be God so
great that you forgot at times to be human? Was following your own principles
so difficult, Father, that you yourself often betrayed them? Were you, Father,
yourself a true Gandhian? Or did you like many others fall along the way to
salvation as did the Pandava heroes on the way to theirs?
More
than half a century has passed since you left us with the name of Ram (perhaps
the most cynical God in Indian mythology) on your lips and yet you left so many
questions unanswered. Sometimes I just wish for a human Father, o Mahatma,
rather than a demigod one. Atleast he wouldn’t be, misanthropic of his nation
and his children. Atleast he wouldn’t shroud himself in a cloak of lies and
secrets. Sometimes we don’t need a God, we need a human being. Sometimes all
one needs is the truth.
“Satyamev Jayate”
Yours truly,
A son.
To say that the truth is necessary is not always the case. The needs of the people comes first. Not everyone might have been able to comprehend his decisions and in the end it would have led to more strife in a time of strife. He made mistakes but that is what it means to be human. It was we who put him on the pedestal of a God for our own convenience and expected him to live up to it. He did his job to the best of his abilities bearing a burden which we could never hope to bear. So give the man some credit.
ReplyDeleteDear Kaustuv please read "India's Biggest Cover up" by Anuj Dhar to find out proper evidence that Gandhi had agreed to the partition long before he kept repeating before the public that the partition would take place before his dead body. Do not forget his signing of the Irwin Pact that ensured the death of Bhagat and his friends. Having personal sexual preferences, however appalling and unnatural to the conservatives,can never excuse sleeping naked with women of the ashram for the sake of experimentation , something which caused a grave rift between Gandhi and Patel. Remember the greatest irony of all, Netaji described Gandhi as the Father of the Nation. If I am not mistaken, the Chauri Chaura incident led to the suspension of what is technically known as the "Non-co-operation movement" and the Dandi March on 12 March 1930 marked the beginning of the Civil Disobedience Movement. You may also read "The Men Who Killed Gandhi" (ostensibly written to glorify Gandhi) and "India Wins Freedom" by Dominique Lapierre (glorifying Gandhi too) but the truth you discover is too shocking to be put in words. If Gandhi's advice to the Jews is absurd, his advice to the Hindu women in Pakistan suffering persecution and rape is simply sickening. There are intellectuals who believe that the partition has actually allowed us a safety valve against Islamic Jehad. This is fool's gold!The partition made a bunch of Islamic fanatics believe that they could gradually get the whole of the Indian subcontinent by generating communal violence. "Freedom at Midnight" clearly tells us about this aim of the fanatics. They were a bunch of Islamic fanatics who had demanded Pakistan and had it not been stoked by the western powers (Churchill et al) who wanted Pakistan to be a centre for the west to control the subcontinent (the advantage went to the US after the fall of Britain as a power post the Second World War) and supported by the likes of Gandhi and Nehru, Pakistan would never have been a reality. Fanatical Islam always aims at creating land for itself for it wants to turn the world into a land of Believers from the status of a land of Kafirs (non-believers). But in China and Russia (even presently in Myanmar) , similar movements were crushed mercilessly. IN Africa, Christians are fighting tooth and nail to ensure that fanatical Islam does not take over. But in India , partition happened , thanks to the politics , and not the ostensible pacifism and passivity of Gandhi. You shall also find Gandhi's views on the World Wars and his appreciation of Hitler's actions quite interesting in the light of the general image he has, that of the "gentle prophet of a non-violent revolution" (Dominique Lapierre). you may read about this in the book "Churchill and Gandhi" by Arthur Herman. It is good to see that some of my students are interested in seeking the truth but back your claims with solid evidence so that you do not have to waste the treasures of your Miltonic mind on intellectual guttersnipes. People who support Gandhi's experiments with nakedness should give it a moments' reflection on how they would have felt if their family members were being exposed to such experiments which would inevitably lead to appalling psychological consequences for those who are initially being led into it by blind devotion of a satanic perversion masquerading as a Holy man's experiments with truth!
ReplyDelete