Being born and brought up in the sleepy metropolis of
Calcutta, I will perhaps never forget the ‘Students’ Movement’ that rocked the
city in September of 2014. The movement reached its peak perhaps on the
afternoon of the 20th of September when a mass rally and walk was
organized from the Rabindra Sadan to the Gandhi Statue on Mayo Road – a 2.3 km
walk in torrential rain. Nearly 70,000 people of different universities,
religions, castes, languages, qualifications and political alignments braved
the fear of going down with pneumonia by turning up for the event. The
organizers of this mass rally ended the day’s walk by initiating a 5-hour
occupation of Mayo Road and JL Nehru Road which they called ‘Occupy
Dharmatala’. The occupation ended when the Governor of the state, Mr. KN
Tripathi , who is also the de-facto Chancellor of Jadavpur University, agreed
to look into the demands of the students, the demands of removing the Vice
Chancellor, pro-Vice Chancellor and Registrar from Jadavpur University.
Now, this causes one to ask the very pertinent question – What
happened at Jadavpur University that prompted a reaction on such a massive
scale?
To answer that question one must refer back to an
on-campus-incident which took place in the last days of August 2014 in which a
female student complained of molestation by a few male students near the
University hostel complex. Now, irrespective of what the female student claims,
the truth about this incident is still very much debatable with numerous
versions of the story being circulated on campus. Some versions, infact, make
it very difficult to sympathize with the female student at all. Having not
talked to the ‘victim’ or the ‘accused’ personally, I will refrain from spewing
out the rumours here. However, two things, most definitely cannot be denied.
Firstly, despite all efforts to deem the movement following this incident as
‘apolitical’, the incident itself was politically-influenced with the girl in
question and the ‘accused’ being of radically opposite political alignments,
which was one of the basic reasons for the altercation between the two parties.
Secondly, whether there was molestation or not, something happened in the
University premises that night before and after the altercation involving the girl,
which should not have happened.
The mass movement hence began originally on 3rd
September 2014, demanding proper investigation into the incident by the
University authorities. In the meantime, the Vice-Chancellor Dr. Abhijit
Chakraborty formed an investigation committee which he maintains, was in
accordance with Supreme Court specifications. The composition of this committee
was however, rejected by the student unions on campus as they feared that the
committee will be biased in its investigation. Now as already mentioned, the
situation to begin with was influenced by politics and Dr. Chakraborty had his political inclination which perhaps was the obvious thorn on the path to an
unbiased investigation. Now, I was all for an investigation into the incident,
which would have implicated the guilty and if not anything else, removed the
untrue versions of the incident from fogging the campus. What I fail to agree
with is the manner in which the student unions demanded the same from the VC.
With the second point in mind, it hence, becomes imperative
to make the campus safer for the thousands of students and professors who study
and work here respectively and the Vice Chancellor wanted to do exactly this
through installation of CCTV cameras throughout the campus, by improving
lighting in the campus, by evicting outsiders from the campus, by introducing a
system of entry into the campus based on Identity Cards and by preventing
anyone from remaining on campus post 8pm. These proposals were all forward-looking
and progressive , in my opinion, paving the way towards making Jadavpur
University a ‘disciplined’ and ‘professional’ institution for all-round
excellence. However , the student unions objected to the VC’s ideas citing
reasons such as ‘loss of freedom’ ,’introduction of elitism’, ‘detachment from
the outside world’, ‘inconveniencing students who forget to carry ID cards’
etc. All these reasons seemed ludicrous to me. In reality, not all the students
but a good number of them do smoke on campus (despite signs prohibiting smoking
on campus), do drink on campus, do immerse themselves into a state of oblivion
through the taking of drugs and smoking of weed and cannabis and do engage in
sexual activities in darkened jheel-paar
(lakeside) or on the vast expanse of the football field. It is these people ,
with intoxicants and power in their hands, whose daily lives will be
interrupted due to the VC’s propose rules and it is for the sake of a few that
Jadavpur University will perhaps forgo the opportunity to progress yet again.
Anyway, thus with an iron-clad intention of opposing the
VC’s ideas and forming a new investigating committee the student unions
protested outside Aurobindo Bhavan , the seat of power at Jadavpur University,
from 2pm on the 16th of September 2014. The mode of protest quickly
turned into Jadavpur’s favourite , a ‘Gherao’- where the students block all
exits and entrances thus trapping the authorities inside the building , not
letting them leave till they agree to their demands. I cannot adequately put
into words my immense dislike for ‘Gheraoing’. Being a student of a Christian
Missionary school, Don Bosco Park Circus, I cannot imagine a situation where I
am blocking my teacher’s path because he/she has not given in to my requests. After
all, he/she is a teacher, irrespective of my personal feelings towards him/her
and notwithstanding his/her age, he/she is more qualified than I am and
deserves that basic shred of respect from me. However, the students who
gheraoed the VC obviously had no such moral restrictions and with no thought
whatsoever into the inconvenience to the VC’s family that they might be
causing, they continued the Gherao well past midnight.
With a family to go to and a worried family, indeed, the
Vice Chancellor did what most men in his position would have done – he called
the police for help. In the wee hours on 17th September, armed
police officers entered the Jadavpur University campus and escorted the trapped
authorities out and then asked the students to leave. The students refused and
the police launched an ambush attack on the students armed with only camera
phones and Bengali expletives. More than 25 students were hospitalized
following the attack and more than 30 were jailed. As despicable as this
incident was , I find it hard to fault the Vice Chancellor for the attack
because indeed he did call the police to ensure his own safety but there is no
proof whatsoever that he forced the police to attack the students . The only
incident that should be protested against here is armed police attack on the
students, especially armed male police officers attacking female students while
female officers stood and watched.
It is because of this dastardly act by the Kolkata Police
and the RAF team at roughly 2 am on the 17th of September that the
movement picked up momentum and gathering steam snowballed into a mass movement
across barriers demanding the resignation of Dr. Chakraborty. The incessant
lying of the Police Commissioner Mr SK Purakayasta on national television , added
fat to fire as the movement got louder and louder with the slogan “Hok kolorob”
meaning “Let there be noise”. The movement , albeit a one that awoke the sleepy
city and showed people that the young heart of the city still beats powerfully
yet non-violently, however has meandered off from its original course of
demanding an unbiased investigation into the ‘molestation’ incident and has
turned into a full-blown personal vendetta against Dr. Chakraborty and the
other authorities.
What the student unions do not realize and what one of my
close friends (whose name I will not reveal for various reasons) is that by
demanding the resignation of Dr. Chakraborty , they are only causing the empty
chair to be filled in by someone with the same political inclinations again
which will simply continue the vicious cycle. Instead the movement should have
focused on changing the way the Vice Chancellor is selected, not by political
parties (as was the case with Dr. Chakraborty) but by an independent and
unbiased in-campus committee. The demand for the resignation of the Pro-VC and
Registrar is baffling to say the least , simply because they have from the
beginning of the movement extended their support to the students , condemning
the police action (unlike the VC) and even visiting the injured students .
Also, by harping again and again on the fact that the
movement is an apolitical one, the student unions have contradicted the very cornerstone
of all movements “You have to be in it to change it”. The movement which has
widely been hailed as a movement for Jadavpur University and against a certain
political party in power in West Bengal is swaying people’s trust from the
ruling party but not providing them with a political alternative in the elections.
They are aiming to change the political contours of the state without being in
politics themselves, a rather strange proposition.
It is very easy to move in the direction of the tide but
extremely difficult to walk against it. The Vice Chancellor and the University
authorities may have been wrong on many counts. The Kolkata Police was
definitely wrong in carrying out an armed attack against students, especially
girls, in the dead of night. However, that in no way hides the fact that the
initial mistakes were all committed by the students. We have committed a
million mistakes and it is because of our mistakes, it is because we could not
repay the trust the authorities placed on us by giving us multiple freedoms
that today there must be measures taken immediately to ensure campus safety. Jadavpur
University still basks in its erstwhile glory days and no matter how many
students one shows me who have left other institutions to join this University,
it does not change the truth. The University has the potential to become the
best in the nation and beyond but the first change has to come in the
change-resistant mentality of the students. The change always begins with us.
A student caught cheating in the exam, if detained in
college, till 2am the next morning will become the poster boy of ‘inhumanly
treatment’ but when the same is done to an elderly gentleman, it is a
revolution?
The end, most definitely, does not justify the means and if
the means are such then the end achieved is pointless as humanity loses for the
sake of a small victory.